Tom Harpur’s article Human Dignity Must Figure in Decisions to Prolong Life

Presents an opposing argument to Harpur’s position that medical technology should not necessarily be used to prolong life.

In this essay I will argue that, given how greatly Harpur’s arguments rely upon fallacies for support, his general thesis – that often medical technology should not be used to prolong life – is therefore invalid and unproven.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *